Printable View
I was just thinking about something for FC Wars is that what if a army got enough credits and then was able to change some things to a war map like a landmine field of course you couldn't delete anything but add stuff like if a army got 10 Credits and then made a no man's land in the middle of the map.
im sorry but no... that would basically create a completly unfair advantage to one team... we want there to still be a chance for both teams to win. Thats one of the reasons that the "one army gets to have 1 extra person playing on a map" was eliminated...
Thanks for the suggestion, but it would be completly unfair to one army
Lets do this and give one army shit load of power weapons right next to there base (Y)
Honestly the idea seems valid expect Halo isn't a strategic shooter like Medal of Honor or Battlefield are. Halo was never built to make tactical advantages.
wait, REDD complained alot about unfair advantages last war, yet your showing your agreeing to another way to basically declares your team the winner without playing the game??? kinda messed up
I never agreed to the idea, it is a great idea. However Halo isn't a tactical game so adding cover at a base won't change the gameplay other then people have a few more places to grab some cover when needed, but who really uses cover in the game?Quote:
Originally Posted by bazongaman502
This idea would work well if no weapons could be placed and Halo was given a cover system and played tactically.
Halo is made to be balanced...
The people who live. That's why you don't rush an opponent, energy shields are given too much comfort. Cover is really underplayed in Halo.Quote:
Originally Posted by EAGLE
Dude we may be bros but that just wouldnt work out, I say keep it the same.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Gamer
well they did an awesome job fuckin that up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzzy