FC Halo 3 COME BACK!?

[Nocte]

I loved Halo 3, but its dead to me. Reach is the new deal guys, its useless trying to keep holding onto a dead game. Lets keep things going with Reach.

The only dead game I would hold on to is Halo 2 *holds while staring at Microsoft* but those bastards shut it off....

[Mi Boys Dinner]

This sounds like a good idea, even if it's only for like one night. If we go back to halo 3, maybe some of the leaders can understand what it is to actually have a war sim again. With the "yes sirs" and running around sandtrap.

Kinda like that one time on Sandbox where you wouldn't run that lap? XP

Um its called infection? Duh Also, flood is a technical zombie like alien thingy. So -2 points for you. :p

But are they nazis? No. So -23 points for you.

[iFurrious]

Um its called infection? Duh Also, flood is a technical zombie like alien thingy. So -2 points for you. :p

I was meant a zombie mode like the one in COD, infection is nothing like it. Plus I said what if Reach had zombies and there is no flood in Reach. So I get my 2 points back and you get -23 points like dinner said.

[Relapsive]

Well i disagree with starting another war in halo 3 alot the rules that are newly made would be meaningless, also if you do that then it would be harder for The Reach Wars to expand as someone mentioned. But I think we would be losing leaders that we need now. Things that people dont realize is that you can be in any clan for 3 years, 4 years any amount that doesnt mean there a good leader that just means there a loyal member in your clan which is a good thing to have there just not ready yet. Not saying that there arent people that have been here for a while and are good leaders im just saying it goes either way. I think we should just wait a while till we get even more people in the clan before making another branch of the clan.

[Nicholas Sapien]

Why not just use the rules from last war to the halo 3 war

[DogmaticAMAN]

id love to participate in h3 wars again
maybe even lead

[Mythonian]

Some things to realize:

This wouldn't be starting up until about March at the absolute earliest, but April is a bit more likely.

To actually do a decent war, you'd need at least 40 or 50 active people willing to participate. I'd estimate that no more than 15 to 20 people currently in FC would go and participate in it, so two months from now that wouldn't hurt us that much, really. These members would mostly be getting the leadership positions.

All of the other members would be recruited from Halo 3 Matchmaking (like Raz said in OP). While the guys are being recruited, we would be setting up the system used for it and everything.

For the forum of it, we have multiple options, one of which is creating a new website, or reusing an old one. We could also copy the category "The Warzone" for the Halo 3 wars, which would probably be directly below the current Warzone on the main forum index.

vBulletin allows you to collapse categories, so anyone not participating in the Halo 3 Wars could click the minus sign on the right edge of the category so it doesn't take up space for them. vBulletin even uses cookies to remember which ones you've collapsed.


The Halo 3 war would have its own warmap, rules of engagement, and everything. These would be set up between now and the start of the wars. Especially near the beginning, it would be a simplified war to ensure we will have enough active people and that it can be effectively managed. If it ends up succeeding and getting a growing memberbase, then it would be expanded into a full-fledged war.

[HeavyArms]

Kinda like that one time on Sandbox where you wouldn't run that lap? XP





But are they nazis? No. So -23 points for you.

I was thinking halo in general. If halo had zombies like CoD then there wouldnt be a point in getting both.

[iFurrious]

I was thinking halo in general. If halo had zombies like CoD then there wouldnt be a point in getting both.

It would save you $60

[HeavyArms]

It would save you $60

Then we have one good game instead of two.

Back on topic.