Interest in FC having a Battlefield 4 XBOX war sim.

[Silko]

I feel bad that so many people feel that Halo is dead. I don't get to get on all the time like how I used to so I have so much fun playing it. Besides that I Think it would be a little much to do both and if you did do this it would probably take over seeing as there are more people who play battlefield.

To be honest Sinopera I don't see a great future in Halo anymore for this community based off the current track record of 343. Now if come Halo 5 and 343 learns from it's mistakes and complete blows our socks off then yeah recruitment and numbers at BN will go up again. However as a community we do have to adapt to survive. If that means bring in a whole other gaming arena then that is what we have to do. Plus it is also a chance to bring BF players who also play halo into our community. I have heard this suggestion before and not just for this game. Before the reveal of the new Battlefront I heard people saying they would love to do FC for battlefront if it ever came out, so the people are already in the community.

[Sinopera]

I understand I know BF is a good game as well as a bunch of other games, I just feel bad that I'm the only one I know that enjoys Halo.

[Silko]

I understand I know BF is a good game as well as a bunch of other games, I just feel bad that I'm the only one I know that enjoys Halo.

I enjoy playing Halo too Sinopera I just don't have the want to play it as much as I use to. The only people on my friends list who play halo anymore are those in FC and they rarely play Halo as well. It is just not much fun to me to play halo by myself so I play other games that I have friends playing as well.

[Nicholas Sapien]

Well there we go. If we get the current numbers that we are getting now 1 to 2 servers will be enough for a single battlenight so that is 50 battlenights right there we don't have to worry about. Oh also REDD calls dips on being the Americans.

lol makes more sense if the reds were russians cause you know, they are commies?

[Jam Cliché]

Like I said in the WC, I don't think Forerunner Conflict should be about anything but Halo. That is a fundamental core that we should not change.

[EagleOne]

Halo 2 Anniversary... It's coming people.

[Platinum]

While it'll be cool, there are a few things that needs to be said.
1) It requires everyone to own the X1. The xbox 360 version WILL NOT have 32v32 multiplayer.
2) It would take too much effort to juggle running the halo war and the bf war.
3) There are a great number of people in this community that would rather havethe community die with Halo, than "adapt" to another game.
4) FC is possible because of Halo. Forge is a reason why. Wars would be really repetitive and short without a forge mode to build maps.
5) EA servers.
6) No theatre mode. While there is a live spectator mode, there is no way to check past violations such as bagging.


There are a few reasons why not. Even though BF would be a better warsim experience (in game squads, spectator mode, commander mode, larger maps and warfare), it'll be harder to maintain and happen.

[Zeta Crossfire]

While it'll be cool, there are a few things that needs to be said.
1) It requires everyone to own the X1. The xbox 360 version WILL NOT have 32v32 multiplayer.

2) It would take too much effort to juggle running the halo war and the bf war.

3) There are a great number of people in this community that would rather havethe community die with Halo, than "adapt" to another game.
4) FC is possible because of Halo. Forge is a reason why. Wars would be really repetitive and short without a forge mode to build maps.
5) EA servers.
6) No theatre mode. While there is a live spectator mode, there is no way to check past violations such as bagging.


There are a few reasons why not. Even though BF would be a better warsim experience (in game squads, spectator mode, commander mode, larger maps and warfare), it'll be harder to maintain and happen.

1: Yeah it would. It would be a fresh start with a new console on a new game. The xbox one is not yet Backwards compatible so we'd try and get a jump on next gen.

2. Different people would be handling each war. Yes some people would leave Halo 4 for Battlefield 4 initially but the wars would be separate, run by a separate WC and HC, members would be ok with being able to go back and forth.

3. This is what I'm trying to over come.

4: Battlefield maps are arguable the most replay able multiplayer maps in FPS games. Yes only 10 maps off the start is low but with destructible environments and dynamic weather games rarely every play out the same.

5: are actually pretty good. Most of my friends who have EA BF3 servers have only had a few issues and that was near the start of BF3 servers. ALSO NO LAG SO YEAH!

6: The XBOX One is equipped with a game DVR so if a t-bag or something like that happens, bam. Built into the system. Also once we get more info on spectator mode perhaps that can help us out as well.

[silversleek(GEN)]

i'd support this idea, but i think it would have to organized seperately from the halo wars, which would be a lot of effort on the part of the people setting it up, especially considering the larger scale of the battles and that all of the people from here wouldn't all cross over. with a 32 v 32, we'd have like one game if every current active member crossed over.

[VerbotenDonkey]

Like I said in the WC, I don't think Forerunner Conflict should be about anything but Halo. That is a fundamental core that we should not change.

I could see an event, but not a whole War running parallel with Halo. We should be using our resources wisely.