Better Battle Nights

[Anarchy]

This system is also going to mean next to shit-all if one side is still getting most of the wins.

"last game's winners" and "last games losers" will just be entire armies.

[Jam Cliché]

This system is also going to mean next to shit-all if one side is still getting most of the wins.

"last game's winners" and "last games losers" will just be entire armies.

I have to agree - we have such a limited pool that any "ranking" system may eventually fruitless. As it is, we can probably predict most game outcomes without punching numbers.

EDIT: I'm not ruling out a desire to theorycraft this topic.

[Houdini]

This system is also going to mean next to shit-all if one side is still getting most of the wins.

"last game's winners" and "last games losers" will just be entire armies.

I thought that was what the WC was working on fixing for the next war with the squad normalization stuff you are talking about. Obviously if the armies are completely lopsided (like a 18-2-2 battle night) then it will be a terrible experience for everybody. As long as the win rate for each army is between .25 and .75 the system will be fine.

- - - Updated - - -

So this is the pretty version that has real teams with real ratings that are real. Or not. But it's super pretty and it updates team rankings automatically and places them with their names so you just got put in W/L right after for easy comparison! Available at your local K-Mart

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing

OP updated with this example.