Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 91
  1. #21

    Re: No more "Babies"

    Lol. I read the title, and I was like "BUT I ONLY HAD ONE!!!" and ran to tell juggs... then I read the post and felt like an idiot. Lol.


    WHOOOOOROOOO OOORHHOOOO
    Redd and Blue vet

  2. #22
    Senior Citizen Yehsus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Northern MA
    Posts
    1,447
    Livestreams
    View Channel: Yehsus

    Re: No more "Babies"

    We should just go all the way and make it 18+.

    But this is a good start.


    et ducit mundum per luce

  3. #23
    The Voice of Reason
    Skynet's Army
    Juggernaut9473's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Weston, Florida
    Posts
    2,346
    Blog Posts
    7

    Re: No more "Babies"

    Quote Originally Posted by RetRdidMunkie View Post
    Lol. I read the title, and I was like "BUT I ONLY HAD ONE!!!" and ran to tell juggs... then I read the post and felt like an idiot. Lol.
    lawl munkie

  4. #24
    Senior Citizen Deathhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Kansas City, Kansas
    Posts
    912
    Blog Posts
    4

    Re: No more "Babies"

    lol

    ...and I don't think I agree with this, I think 14+ would be the right decision.
    I joined when I was 13 and was only immature during non-fc stuff.

    We shouldn't limit everyone, that could cancel out some really great potential.
    A "mature" 13/14yr old who is still accepted into the wars would know they have an opportunity, and most wouldn't blow it.

    13/14 year olds also make great soldiers, they have more time because they aren't in HS yet.



    If you really want to make this website known, I have some ideas... Make me the PR guy.

  5. #25
    Former X-Ray Commander
    Vector Platoon Commander
    Vestige's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    HMCS VANCOUVER
    Posts
    1,576
    Blog Posts
    15

    Re: No more "Babies"

    18+ is fucking redonklous...
    VECTOR PLATOON
    //work in progress\\
    Recruitment: Message to apply.
    Age: 21+
    Faction: BLUE
    Dishcord: https://discord.gg/33sZQb4



  6. #26

    Re: No more "Babies"

    Quote Originally Posted by EAGLE View Post
    Math? Oh shit.....

    this. i refuse to do math. if they aren't squeakers, and aren't immature dicks, i don't care about there age, i'll send em to bootcamp.
    Spem Successus Alit

    RP forces
    RP Units guide

  7. #27
    The Elder Trolls V:
    The King of the HEEL
    GAMEHEEL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    ?
    Posts
    192
    Blog Posts
    3

    Re: No more "Babies"

    I think 15 is fair that is a very mature age there is some potential here to be seen in this change........
    I personally think 14 wouldn't have been bad but 15 is okay with me

  8. #28
    Banned BANNED USER
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    780
    Blog Posts
    1

    Re: No more "Babies"

    it is required, if your not willing to do the unpleasentries of being an officer than you shouldnt be one. it isnt for you to judge wiether you send them off to bootcamp.... if they arent 15 they dont join, period.


    EDIT: This is directed at silversleek

  9. #29
    Senior Citizen VerbotenDonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Returning to his Watch
    Posts
    7,060
    Blog Posts
    3

    Re: No more "Babies"

    Quote Originally Posted by KillerGUNNY132 View Post
    I dont know if I 100 percent agree with this.

    I mean I joined RvBR when I was 12 years of age and I was fine. I lead a Battalion when I was 14. Hell, I was fucking Field Marshall at 15.

    Instead of enforcing an age limit, you should make sure they are mature enough. Talk with them a bit, or even judge that on how they handle the bootcamp.

    I feel like the goal of this community RIGHT NOW is to further it and garner some sort of attention. We've been this underground War-Sim/Gaming Community for too long. Its about time we put ourselves on the map. And I feel restricting people based on their age would hinder any kind of progress.

    But maybe that's just me.
    I'm agreeing with Gunny here. What we need isn't an age limit, it's a maturity limit. I know just as many older kids who are more ignorant.

    When they're younger, it also gives them more experience in the community so that when they do turn "15" they are capable to handle Officer positions and gives them more time in the community before they get more responsibilities in life as they go down the road.
    Joined April 2007
    Founder of the LARP
    Founder of the Imperial Office of Naval Intelligence
    Squads led:
    Halo 3 Era: XO of Wolf Squad, CO of Nova Squad
    Halo Reach Era: CO of 1st Marines Platoon, CO of Foxtrot Squad, CO of Wolfpack Squad, CO of REDWATCH Special Forces
    Halo 4 Era: CO of REDWATCH Special Forces, Director of Imperial Office of Naval Intelligence and Project ARTEMIS, CO of the Dark Sail Raiders
    Halo 5 Era: CO of REDWATCH Special Forces





  10. #30
    The Voice of Reason
    Skynet's Army
    Juggernaut9473's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Weston, Florida
    Posts
    2,346
    Blog Posts
    7

    Re: No more "Babies"

    Quote Originally Posted by VerbotenDonkey View Post
    I'm agreeing with Gunny here. What we need isn't an age limit, it's a maturity limit. I know just as many older kids who are more ignorant.

    When they're younger, it also gives them more experience in the community so that when they do turn "15" they are capable to handle Officer positions and gives them more time in the community before they get more responsibilities in life as they go down the road.
    i agree with donkey and gunny

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Website maintained by Metkil5685 and Mythonian.